perm filename MONOP.TEX[ESS,JMC]1 blob
sn#437441 filedate 1989-01-12 generic text, type C, neo UTF8
COMMENT ā VALID 00002 PAGES
C REC PAGE DESCRIPTION
C00001 00001
C00002 00002 MONOPOLIES IN HOME COMPUTER SERVICES
C00008 ENDMK
Cā;
MONOPOLIES IN HOME COMPUTER SERVICES
\Cby John McCarthy
\J A number of proposals have been made to provide home computer
and other information services using cable television facilities, and
the FCC has required that cable television companies provide two-way
communication in order to facilitate this. It seems to me that the
present direction of thought and development has some serious
defects, because it may promote monopoly in a new field in which
monopoly is neither necessary nor desirable.
Namely, the presumption of all these proposals is that the
information services will be provided by the cable TV company. This
will have the consequence that only the services which the local cable
TV company chooses to provide will be available and at prices which
this company chooses or is regulated to charge. This is bad in
general if avoidable, but in the case of home computer services, it
has the following specific disadvantages:
1. Home information services (take CAI as an example) will
require elaborate programs and will need to have national markets to
repay the cost of programming them.
2. The cost of providing them will be determined by very
complex considerations, so that it will be very difficult to say
which changes justify which changes in price so that regulation will
be difficult.
Contrast this with the following situation:
Communication is provided by a common carrier which will
allow the home terminal to be connected with anyone providing
computer services. The terminals are sold or rented by competing
companies and meet only general communication interface
specifications. The computer systems that run the home information
service programs are also public so that anyone who wants to sell the
services of a program can rent file storage in anyone computer
service center, and the center will collect from users whatever he
charges for the use of the program and charge him its standard rates
for the resources used. Communication costs are such that service
centers can compete all over the country and, in fact, all over the
world. At present, General Electric serves time-sharing customers in
Europe and Japan from a center in the U.S.
In my opinion, providing free competition must be a dominant
consideration in any scheme for providing home computer services
imaginatively, rapidly, and economically.
Therefore, plans should be based either on the telephone
system which is already a common carrier, or the CATV systems should
be developed into common carriers of the kind of information they are
suited to transmit. The former seems more feasible to me.
Telephones already have high enough bandwidth for most contemplated
information services, and the bandwidth required to support the
proposed Picturephone facilities will be more than adequate.\.